Asking about climate change: reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Asking about climate change : reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000. / Nielsen, Jonas Østergaard; D'haen, Sarah Ann Lise.

I: Global Environmental Change, Bind 24, 2014, s. 402–409.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nielsen, JØ & D'haen, SAL 2014, 'Asking about climate change: reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000', Global Environmental Change, bind 24, s. 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.006

APA

Nielsen, J. Ø., & D'haen, S. A. L. (2014). Asking about climate change: reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000. Global Environmental Change, 24, 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.006

Vancouver

Nielsen JØ, D'haen SAL. Asking about climate change: reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000. Global Environmental Change. 2014;24:402–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.006

Author

Nielsen, Jonas Østergaard ; D'haen, Sarah Ann Lise. / Asking about climate change : reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000. I: Global Environmental Change. 2014 ; Bind 24. s. 402–409.

Bibtex

@article{b6269d690d504699bb2a49867128d7e6,
title = "Asking about climate change: reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000",
abstract = "There is increasing evidence that climate change will strongly affect people across the globe. Likely impacts of and adaptations to climate change are drawing the attention of researchers from many disciplines. In adaptation research focus is often on perceptions of climate change and on vulnerability and adaptation strategies in a particular region or community. But how do we research the ways in which people experience changing climatic conditions, the processes of decision-making, the actual adaptation strategies carried out and the consequences of these for actors living and dealing with climate change? On the basis of a literature review of all articles published in Global Environmental Change between 2000 and 2012 that deal with human dimensions of climate change using qualitative methods this paper provides some answers but also raises some concerns. The period and length of fieldwork and the number and types of interviews conducted are, for example, not always clear. Information on crucial aspects of qualitative research like researcher positionality, social positions of key informants, the use of field assistants, language issues and post-fieldwork treatment of data is also lacking in many articles. We argue that this lack of methodological information and reflections is particularly problematic in an interdisciplinary field such as climate change research and journals such as Global Environmental Change and that clearer communication is key to facilitate truly interdisciplinary dialogue.",
author = "Nielsen, {Jonas {\O}stergaard} and D'haen, {Sarah Ann Lise}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.006",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "402–409",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asking about climate change

T2 - reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000

AU - Nielsen, Jonas Østergaard

AU - D'haen, Sarah Ann Lise

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - There is increasing evidence that climate change will strongly affect people across the globe. Likely impacts of and adaptations to climate change are drawing the attention of researchers from many disciplines. In adaptation research focus is often on perceptions of climate change and on vulnerability and adaptation strategies in a particular region or community. But how do we research the ways in which people experience changing climatic conditions, the processes of decision-making, the actual adaptation strategies carried out and the consequences of these for actors living and dealing with climate change? On the basis of a literature review of all articles published in Global Environmental Change between 2000 and 2012 that deal with human dimensions of climate change using qualitative methods this paper provides some answers but also raises some concerns. The period and length of fieldwork and the number and types of interviews conducted are, for example, not always clear. Information on crucial aspects of qualitative research like researcher positionality, social positions of key informants, the use of field assistants, language issues and post-fieldwork treatment of data is also lacking in many articles. We argue that this lack of methodological information and reflections is particularly problematic in an interdisciplinary field such as climate change research and journals such as Global Environmental Change and that clearer communication is key to facilitate truly interdisciplinary dialogue.

AB - There is increasing evidence that climate change will strongly affect people across the globe. Likely impacts of and adaptations to climate change are drawing the attention of researchers from many disciplines. In adaptation research focus is often on perceptions of climate change and on vulnerability and adaptation strategies in a particular region or community. But how do we research the ways in which people experience changing climatic conditions, the processes of decision-making, the actual adaptation strategies carried out and the consequences of these for actors living and dealing with climate change? On the basis of a literature review of all articles published in Global Environmental Change between 2000 and 2012 that deal with human dimensions of climate change using qualitative methods this paper provides some answers but also raises some concerns. The period and length of fieldwork and the number and types of interviews conducted are, for example, not always clear. Information on crucial aspects of qualitative research like researcher positionality, social positions of key informants, the use of field assistants, language issues and post-fieldwork treatment of data is also lacking in many articles. We argue that this lack of methodological information and reflections is particularly problematic in an interdisciplinary field such as climate change research and journals such as Global Environmental Change and that clearer communication is key to facilitate truly interdisciplinary dialogue.

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 402

EP - 409

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

ER -

ID: 74263498